Governments are making numerous and continuous efforts to combat climate change and reduce carbon emissions. There was a temporary decrease in carbon emissions in the 2020 pandemic lockdown. However, we have witnessed a tremendous increase in the same since then. This global energy outlook 2024 looks at how things have improved in the 1st half of the year. Moreover, how and what better improvements or drawbacks will be there by 2050?

Global Energy Outlook 2024: Recent Developments and Emerging Trends

To understand the speed and shape of energy transition to 2050, there are 2 scenarios to explore. Net Zero is in line with Paris’s consistent IPCC

  • Current Trajectory – The current pathway taken by the global energy system. It focuses on climate policies already enforced and global aims and pledges for future decarbonization. It also covers the challenges associated with meeting these aims.
  • Net Zero – It explores changes in various elements of an energy system to reduce carbon emissions. It is like a what-if scenario highlighting which element could change and how if the world acts collectively for CO2e to fall by 9%% by 2050.

This approach also embodies changes in societal behaviors and preferences to support energy efficiency and the adoption of low-carbon energy. The speed and extent of decarbonization in Net Zero is aligned with a range of IPCC scenarios consistent with meeting the Paris climate goals. By comparing the cumulative carbon emissions in both scenarios from 2015 to 2050 with the ranges of corresponding carbon trajectories, it is possible to make an indirect inference.

Energy Demand

It is majorly due to the increasing prosperity in developing economies.

Growth in Energy Demand

The demand for energy is increasing as the young economies are getting better off; however, this has been balanced by improvements in energy efficiency. The speed of improvement in energy efficiency will determine the rate of future increase in energy efficiency.

  • Annual GDP growth average – 2.4%
  • It is slower than the average of almost 3.5% per year as seen in the previous 25 years.

Causes – Slow population growth and weak improvements in GDP per capita.

With the world economy doubling by 2050 the main reason will be increasing prosperity. It which accounts for 70% of the increase in global activity.

Annual gains in energy efficiency average – 2.1% (Current Trajectory) and 3.4% (Net Zero).

Causes – Increasing shift towards solar and wind power generation. It reduces the energy losses associated, speeds up decarbonizing the energy system, and enhances energy security.

In developing economies, demand grows over the first half and after that, it depends majorly on the pace of decarbonization. The growth continues in Current Trajectory by 45%. Whereas, in Net Zero, the outlook shows an increase in early 2030s but by 2050 it will be around 10% below the 2022 levels.

Average energy growth pf primary energy and by region.
Pic Credits: BP

Energy Efficiency Demand in Developed vs Developing Economies

  • Developed Economies – Growth in energy consumption reflects greater gains in energy efficiency and slower economic growth. In past 20 years, a decline in energy demand has been witnessed between 20-40% over the outlook in Net Zero and Current Trajectory.
  • Developing Economies – Slower economic growth paired with faster energy efficiency means a weaker global primary energy demand than in the past. As per the outlook in Net Zero, the demand actually falls.

In past 25 years, the average energy annual rate was 1.8%, out of which: Current Trajectory growth – 0.2% and Net Zero average annual decline – 1.1%

Increase in Renewables Decarbonizes Energy Demand

Wind, solar, geothermal, and bioenergy are the fastest-growing primary energy in the renewable energy sector.

  • Current Trajectory: In the mid-2030s, primary energy demand in the Current Trajectory increases before plateauing as increases in energy consumption in emerging economies continue.
  • Net Zero: In the middle of the current decade, energy demand peaks at Net Zero before declining as efforts to decarbonize the energy sector increase.
ParametersCurrent TrajectoryNet Zero
Energy Demand (2050)5% more than 2022 levels25% less than 2022 levels
Renewable energyDouble than 2022More than 3-fold
Coal ConsumptionBetween 35-85%Between 35-85%
Oil Demand (2050)One-third decrease from 2022 to a quarterMore than 10% decrease
Energy outlook 2024 Increase in Renewables Decarbonizes Energy Demand
Pic Credits: BP

Declining Road Transport Drives Oil Demand Fall

Oil has a major role in the global energy system over the first half as the world consumed between 100-80 Mb/d oil in 2035 in Current Trajectory and Net Zero respectively.

Causes in Decrease – Adoption of fuel alternatives, less use of diesel generators, fuel-efficient vehicles, use of fuel substitutes in off-road industrial vehicles.

ParametersCurrent TrajectoryNet Zero
Oil Consumption (2050)Around 75 Mb/dDecrease between 25-30 Mb/d (70% less than 2022 levels)
Use in Feedstocks25 Mb/d in the 2040 
Declining Road Transport Drives Oil Demand Fall
Pic Credits: BP

Electricity Replaced Oil as the Main Energy for Road Transport

Internal combustion engine (ICE) light vehicles stayed the same during the 1st half. The decrease in demand in developed countries is balanced by an increased demand in developing countries.

DHL and Envision’s Green Logistics and Energy Partnership aims to transform the air transport sector.

In 2022, the global light-duty vehicle increased from 1.5 billion to around 2 billion vehicles in 2035 and then to 2.5 billion in 2050. The global fleet of medium and heavy-duty (MHD) trucks increased from about 65 million in 2022 to around 110 million by 2050 in the two scenarios.

Causes – Introduction of more light vehicles and rising prosperity leading to car ownership.

ParametersCurrent TrajectoryNet Zero
ICE vehicles Demand10% less than 202275% less
Oil and oil-based products Demands (2050)From 30 Mb/d in 2022 to 16 and four Mb/d due to ICE vehicles from 13 Mb/d in 2022 to 7 Mb/d due to MHD trucksfall by four Mb/d due to ICE vehicles. Fall to 2 Mb/d due to MHD trucks
MHD trucks demand (2050)fall from more than 90% in 2022 to 60%25% reduction
Global energy outlook 2024 Electricity Replaced Oil as the Main Energy for Road Transport
Pic Credits: BP

Decarbonization of Marine and Aviation Transport

A combination of hydrogen-derived fuels and biofuels is decreasing carbonization from air and water transport. All SAF is derived from bio-feedstocks and by 2035 this low-carbon fuel will account for 5-10% and close to 20% by 2050 of total aviation fuel. The growing role of SAF is estimated by an increase in production capacity between 15 and 30 world-scale facilities coming online every year from 2030 to 2040.

Africa’s 76% of Energy Could be Renewable by 2040, says a UT co-ed study

Causes – Increased use of liquid sustainable aviation fuel (SAF).

ParametersCurrent TrajectoryNet Zero
Air transport demand (2025-2050)Will increase between 75%40% increase
Energy Demand35% growth between 2025-2050.10% increase
Water transport & tradeIncrease by 70%30% increase
Energy DemandUnchanged20% decrease with hydrogen-based fuels 40% and biofuels by 30% share.
Decarbonization of Marine and Aviation Transport
Pic Credits: BP

Power Sector

The increased use of electricity in energy systems is more evident in all sectors. There is a significant growth in energy demand as economies are emerging and developing. In developed economies, electricity consumption increases at an annual rate of 1.5%, which is 3 times faster than the past 20 years. Here, India is notably mentioned as it will overtake the EU as the 3rd largest power market globally in 2035.

Causes – Increasing use of electricity and growing demand from data centers for AI.

Growth in Electricity Demand

The biggest growth is seen in the transport sector, especially road transport. It is estimated that there will be a considerable decrease in electrification in transportation by 2050.

ParametersCurrent TrajectoryNet Zero
Final Electricity Demand (2050)75% increase90% increase
Share of Electricity in World’s Total Final Consumption (TFC)Increases from 20% in 2022 to 35% by 2050More than 50%
Electrifying Industrial Sector40-60%40-60%

Massive Wind & Solar Expansion Dominating Power Generation

In India, to meet growing energy demands coal generation will increase by more than 90% by 2050. There will be a notable increase in bioenergy and geothermal power generation in upcoming years.

ParametersCurrent TrajectoryNet Zero
Total Power Generation8-fold increase around 23,000 TWh14-fold increase than 2022 40,000-45,000 TWh (from wind & solar majorly)
Coal-fired Generation  Falls by 40% by 2050Fall by 90% (Global share from 40% to 1%)  
Gas Fired Generation (by 2050)Increases by 40%, triples in AsiaFalls by more than 18%, nearing 5%.
Coal & Natural Gas (2050)Close to a 3rd of global generationMore than double by around 3-quarters
Nuclear & Hydropower (2050)Increases to reach 20%Close to 20% of total power generation
Carbon Intensity of Power Generation  Declines by over 60% over the outlookAlmost complete elimination of fossil fuel emissions with CCUS (BECCS) results in the power sector.  
A graph showing electricity generation by source in Net Zero and Current Trajectory - Energy Outlook 2024
Pic Credits: BP

Cost Reduction due to Rapid Wind and Solar Expansion

There will be rapid advancements in solar and wind and solar technologies leading to cost reductions. It will also accelerate the establishment of new capacities. It is expected that China and other developed economies will contribute around 30-45% of the increase in new capacity during the 1st half of the outlook. Cost reductions will be more pronounced during the first 10–15 years of the outlook.

Causes – Upgrade and expansion in infrastructure, improved social acceptance, increased flexibility, and sped up planning and permission.

ParametersCurrent TrajectoryNet Zero
Wind & Solar Capacity (2050)Around 8-fold increaseIncreases by a factor of 14.
Total Buildout (wind and solar)Close to a 3rd of total buildout, China accounting for an additional 35%More than 60%, China’s share 25%
Installed wind & solar capacity (Annual additions)400-800 GW by 2035, about 1.5-3 times faster than the average pace of additions.400-800 GW by 2035

Increasing Power System Resilience to Renewables’ Variability

The power systems need to adapt to handle the growing unpredictability due to solar and wind power. Thus, it can ensure resiliency throughout the system. Wind and solar power are used accordingly in various markets. For example, in the EU and India, wind and solar power make up an energy mix of as much as 75-80% in Net Zero scenarios. There is less reliance on other low-carbon energy sources like nuclear power, hydropower, and CCUS in these regions.

Around 70-80% increase in battery storage capacity is taking place in emerging economies. These markets have abundant solar power and are using batteries in a better way to manage daily challenges.

ParametersCurrent TrajectoryNet Zero
Wind & Solar share in Global Power Generation (2050)Little more than 10% in 2022 to between 50-70% by 2050.From 10% in 2022 to 50-70%
Battery Storage Capacity (2050)Increases to 2,200 GWIncreases to 4,200 GW
Comparison wind, solar and installed battery storage as per energy outlook 2024
Pic Credits: BP

4 factors determine the resilience of the power system against different types of fluctuations.

  • Overuse of renewables’ capacity: The availability of wind and sunlight determines wind and solar power production. To meet approximately 70% of power demand throughout the year, extra wind and solar capacity is needed. This will ensure enough power generation even on unfavorable weather days.
  • Flexibility: By modifying other forms of generation or demand power systems should be flexible. Using hydro-pumped storage, interconnectors, and other mechanisms to meet the demand.
  • Dispatchable capacity: It is the contractually guaranteed generation capacity, which is provided when required. It includes battery storage, gas and coal stations, and interconnectors.
  • Long-duration energy storage (LDES): This means reducing the impact caused by shortages of renewable energy resources at certain times of the year. Natural gas with CCS can help in addressing these situations. Low-carbon hydrogen with hydrogen storage can be an alternative source for LDES.

Low Carbon Hydrogen

This mainly includes low-carbon hydrogen and its production. Moreover, it is highly likely that the transition speed is affecting the adoption of low-carbon hydrogen in the market.

Speed of Energy Transition Defines the Role of Low-Carbon Hydrogen

Low-carbon hydrogen is an essential addition to the expanding electrification of the energy system. It is useful in challenging sectors like industries and transportation. Also, it plays an important role in long-term energy storage solutions in power markets, making it an indispensable resource.

The role of low-carbon hydrogen is most influential in Net Zero as policies support it. In the Current Trajectory, its role is more limited. There will be a rise in demand in 2nd half of the outlook, in Net Zero.

Causes – Primarily used in refining, methane & ammonia production, and in transportation (especially long-distance).

ParametersCurrent TrajectoryNet Zero
Usage of Low-Carbon Hydrogen (2050)Increasing less than 20 Mtpa by 2035 and around 85 Mtpa by 2050  Will grow to 90 Mtpa by 2035 and to 390 Mtpa by 2050.  

Effect on Production

It is produced from the combination of green and blue hydrogen. Initially, blue hydrogen is cheaper than green hydrogen but as production costs differ by region, the price increases. Access to natural gas, CO2 storage sites, renewable resources, and coal also varies. Moreover, transport costs are high.

It is estimated, by 2050, 60% of low-carbon hydrogen in Net Zero will be green hydrogen mainly produced in India and China. The rest will be blue hydrogen coming from natural gas, mostly produced in the US and Middle East.

Low Carbon Hydrogen Growth: Regional Markets and Global Seaborne Trade

The growth of low-carbon hydrogen is mainly focused on regional markets but it also includes some global seaborne trade. However, global trade of this hydrogen is increasing, especially in Singapore, South Korea, the EU, the US, Japan, Australia, and the Middle East.

It is estimated by 2035, the EU will need hydrogen derivates like methanol and ammonia for transporting marine and chemicals. Moreover, there will also be demands for synthetic jet fuel and hydrogen-based direct reduced iron to make low-carbon steel. Also, the increasing EU’s hydrogen demand will be met through seaborne imports.

Causes – Half of the demanded quantity is used in pure form as feedstock in refining, buildings, and transport. Cost and difficulty in transporting pure form of hydrogen, over longer distances.

ParametersCurrent TrajectoryNet Zero
Hydrogen Demand in the EUGrows around 5-10 Mtpa by 2035Grows around 5-10 Mtpa by 2035
Use of Low-Carbon Hydrogen by the EU (2050)Increases by 15 MtpaIncreases by 40 Mtpa
EU Hydrogen (pure form) DemandDecrease by 40%Reduces by 25%
global energy outlook 2024-2050 Low Carbon Hydrogen Growth: Regional Markets and Global Seaborne Trade
Pic Credits: BP

Carbon Mitigation and Removal

To increase the pace of transition, it is equally important to remove and reduce the carbon emissions from local to industrial scales.

Importance of CCUS for Deep Decarbonization

The usage of carbon capture and storage effectively supports deep decarbonization. It also helps to capture industrial process emissions, enables the removal of energy-based CO2, and reduces emissions from coal and natural gas.

ParametersNet Zero
Demand for CCUS  Increase to 1 GtCO2 by 2035 and to 7 GtCO2 by 2050  
CCUS with BECCS  1 GtCO2 by 2050  
Direct air capture and storage (DACCS)  Extract around 1 GtCO2 by 2050  

It is costly to add CCUS to industrial and energy processes but to achieve NET Zero, it is crucial. About 60% of total Net Zero CCUS deployment is in China and other developing countries. CCUS has the potential to achieve 40% capacity by 2050 through the functions of capturing industrial process emissions and enabling energy-based CDR. The cement industry’s captured emissions will account for around 15% of CCUS capacity by 2050.

In 2050, even with CCUS expansion, the use of coal and natural gas will decrease much more than the 2022 levels. The Outlook has not included the Natural climate solutions (NCS) which also focuses on carbon emission reduction.

A graph showing carbon capture, use and storage . Gas and coal consumption abated and unabated.
Pic Credits: BP

Enablers

Without efficient investment in the renewable energy sector, a smooth and quick transition is not possible.

Investment in Renewable and Fossil Fuel Energy Sources

Substantial investments across various energy sources and vectors support the transition of the global energy system. Now, solar and wind energy sectors require more investments than ever. It is also necessary to achieve the goals of Net Zero and the Current Trajectory. However, the outlook does not emphasize stopping investments in the oil and gas sectors but the focus should be on natural gas due to its high consumption resilience.

ParametersCurrent TrajectoryNet Zero
Scale of Investment in Wind & SolarA bit less but around $500 billion/yearHigher around $1 trillion/year
Cumulative Investment in Wind and Solar Capacity$14 trillion, roughly spread between solar and wind.$28 trillion, roughly spread between solar and wind.
Total Investment (%) Emerging Economies50% of the total70% of the total
Oil and Gas InvestmentRemains close to recent levelsFalls sharply in final 20 years of outlook, due to shift to renewables.
A graph showing average annua investment in wind and solar
Pic Credits: BP

No New Fossil Fuel Projects Needed to Meet Energy Demands, UCL and IISD researchers says

Demand for Critical Minerals on Rise

With the increase in the energy system transition, there is an increase in the demand for critical minerals too.

With the rapid electrification of transport systems, rare earth or critical materials demand will also increase. Same for low-carbon energy, minerals like nickel, copper, and lithium will be required in high quantities. By 2050, it is estimated that around 80% of lithium demand will be from EVs, which was only 40% in 2022.

ParametersCurrent TrajectoryNet Zero
Growth in EVs (2050)increases to 1.2 billionGrows to 2.1 billion
Annual Battery Capacity DemandRise between 9-18 TWhRise between 9-18 TWh
Demand for Copper (2050)Increases by 75%Increases by 100%
Lithium Demand (2050)Increases 8-foldIncreases 14-fold
Nickel Demand (2050)Increase by 2-fold, mostly due to increased Li-ion batteries in EVs.Increase by 3-fold
Demand for Critical Minerals on Rise as per global energy outlook
Pic Credits: BP

It is thus important that critical minerals’ supply meets the demands without constraints on cost, pace, availability, or the nature of energy transition. The challenge of scaling up will be worsened for the countries to ensure geographically dispersed resources for supply security and sustainability oversight of mining activities.

Requirements to Accelerate Energy Transitions

  • The faster shift to Net Zero in comparison to the Current Trajectory will be mainly due to increased decarbonization in the industrial and power sectors.
  • Emerging economies decarbonizing their power sector rapidly.
  • Industries tend to decarbonize faster in Net Zero in comparison to Current Trajectory. This is due to lower carbon electricity and greater improvements in efficiency.
  • Higher electrification of road transport accounts for faster decarbonization in the transport sector in Net Zero than the Current Trajectory.
  • In Net Zero, buildings (construction industry) decarbonize rapidly than the Current Trajectory. This is highly supported by accelerating energy efficiency, conservation, and lower-carbon electricity.

Source: bp Energy Outlook 2024

Share.
mm

Olivia is committed to green energy and works to help ensure our planet's long-term habitability. She takes part in environmental conservation by recycling and avoiding single-use plastic.

Leave A Reply