The market for energy, particularly solar panels, was almost completely dominated by REC Solar Panels. On the other hand, LG isn’t far behind it either. Solar panels from Q Cells and REC are strong, have a long warranty period, produce a lot of power, work well, and have many other qualities. Now, the question lies between REC vs LG solar panels which is better? To discover the solution and relevant facts about the differences between REC and LG solar panels, read the blog.
REC vs LG Solar Panels Overview
As you begin learning about REC vs LG solar panels, let us learn about the backgrounds of both companies and their role in this market. REC is a pioneer in the solar business and a top developer of solar PV technology. The cutting-edge Alpha series panels, which use high-performance heterojunction cells, have elevated REC to the same level as the top producers in the world and are among the most effective solar panels currently on the market. The more affordable REC Twinpeak and N-peak solar panels offer excellent value in the fiercely competitive solar market and are covered by above-average 25-year performance warranties in addition to a 20-year product guarantee.
With a lengthy history of producing solar panels, LG is regarded as a leader in the field and has established itself as a manufacturer of some of the highest-quality and best-performing solar panels in the world. On the well-known Neon R, Neon 2, and the new Neon H panels, LG uses more expensive, premium N-type silicon cells than the majority of other producers, which boosts efficiency and lengthens lifespan by considerably reducing LID or light-induced degradation.
REC vs LG Solar Panels Efficiency
The phrase solar panel efficiency describes how effectively a solar panel absorbs sunlight and transforms it into usable energy. A solar panel with higher efficiency will generate more energy than a panel with lower efficiency of the same size under the same circumstances. Because of this, a greater efficiency rating is typically preferred. Now, let’s learn REC vs LG solar panels efficiency.
REC Solar Panel Efficiency
Depending on the particular model you choose for your system, the efficiency of your REC solar panels will alter. An efficiency rating of 19.1% to 22.3% is assigned to solar panels in the REC product range. A summary of each REC model’s efficiency is provided below:
| REC Series | Efficiency |
| Alpha Pure R | 20.7%-22.3% |
| Alpha Pure | 21.1%-22.2% |
| N-Peak 2 (black) | 19.1%-20.3% |
| Twinpeak 4 (black) | 19.4%-20.3% |
Also Read: What is Conversion Efficiency?
LG Solar Panel Efficiency
Depending on the particular type you pick for your house, the efficiency of your LG solar panels will change. On the low end, LG panels have an efficiency of around 18.4%, while their top-tier solar PV products have an efficacy of up to 22.1%.
| LG Series | Efficiency |
| Mono X Plus | Up to 19.8% |
| Neon H | Up to 20.9% |
| Neon 2 | Up to 21.4% |
| Neon R | Up to 22.0% |
Also See: REC vs Q Cell Solar Panels
REC vs LG Solar Panels Capacity
As learning about REC and LG solar panels, let’s move forward into the knowing of REC vs LG solar panels capacity.
REC Solar Panel
In 2019, the company unveiled its Alpha Series solar panels. It was the highest-capacity 60-cell module on the market at the time, per REC. Panel effectiveness of up to 22.2% is provided by Alpha Pure, which followed the Alpha and is offered in the following wattages: 385W, 390W, 395W, 400W, 405W, and 410W. At first, the Alpha had maximum panel effectiveness of 21.7%.
LG Solar Panels
Whenever the topic comes regarding REC vs LG solar panels capacity, you must know that the two main producers of high-performance IBC or Interdigitated Back Contact N-type cells are LG and SunPower. Thirty busbars are built into the back portion of the LG Neon R IBC cells. As a result, the front of the cell has no obvious busbars and, consequently, no cell shading.
The Neon R modules can achieve a remarkable 22.0% efficiency at 380W thanks to this innovative design, which makes use of high-purity N-type doped silicon and has extremely low light-induced degradation, reduced electrical resistance, and better high-temperature performance.
Here is a list of Capacities of models of LG Solar Panels:
| LG Series | Wattage |
| Mono X plus | 370 W |
| Neon H | 385 W |
| Neon 2 | 370 W |
| Neon R | 380 W |
Also See: Longi solar Panels Vs Canadian Solar Panels
REC vs LG Solar Panels Output
After a year of use, the output of both REC and LG solar panels will have decreased by nearly 2%. This decreased rate is in line with and even better than most panels. However, for the remaining life of both these panels, their outputs will decline differently. Per year, the REC panels’ output will go down by 0.25%. On the other hand, the output of LG panels will go down by 0.3% per year. This may seem like a minimal difference but at the end of 25 years, the output of LG panels will be 90.8% which is lesser than the 92% output of REC panels. In such a scenario, the REC panels will have an advantage over the LG ones. This should have given you a deep understanding of REC vs LG solar panels output. After this, let’s look at REC vs LG solar panels price range
Also Read: What is the Average Solar panel Output Per day?
REC vs LG Solar Panels Price Range
As you compare, REC vs LG solar panels price range, you must remember that the majority of REC solar PV systems are a good value in the home solar market because they are usually priced between $2.32 and $3.10 per watt.
When comparing REC vs LG solar panels price range, it is found that the price for LG systems usually ranges from $2.46 to $3.38 per watt.
Also See: Solar Panel Comparision Guide: Jinko vs Longi
REC vs LG Solar Panels Which Is Better?
So, REC vs LG solar panels which is better? Well, both REC and LG Solar create solar panels that are visually pleasing. For customers who prefer it, REC has the benefit of offering its panels in an elegant all-black design. The LG 375, in contrast, has dark blue cells as opposed to REC’s black ones.
The production of the REC panels will decrease by 0.25% annually, whereas the output of the LG panels will decrease by 0.3% annually. Even though this might seem like a very small change, the output of the REC panels will be 92% as opposed to 90.8% for LG after 25 years. This results in 1.2% more energy produced over the system’s lifetime, providing REC with a significant advantage.
Here is a thorough description of the comparison of both models:
| Brand | REC | LG Solar |
| Model | REC 375AA | LG375Q1C-V5 |
| Type | Monocrystalline | Monocrystalline |
| Wattage | 375 | 375 |
| Module Efficiency | 21.4% | 21.7% |
| Annual Degradation Rate | 0.25% | 0.3% |
| Rated Output | 92.0% | 90.8% |
| Power Warranty Type | Linear | Linear |
| Product Warranty | 25 years | 25 years |
| Height (in) | 67.8 | 66.9 |
| Weight (lb) | 43 | 39 |
In conclusion, it is obvious that high-end solar panels are a great choice for any homeowner, and both REC and LG Solar produce them. Despite having a 0.3% lower efficiency than the LG 375Q1C-V5 panels, the REC 375AA panels have a better degradation rate, leading to a higher overall production over a 25-year period. Both panels have excellent 25-year warranties, but the REC panels come with a 25-year work warranty in addition to the standard 25-year product and performance warranties. So, in most terms, REC is better than LG.
Recommended: Ecoflow Delta Pro Review- Is It Worth It?
